![]() The premium on becoming the moderate answer to Sanders was obvious in the speeches by Klobuchar, Buttigieg and even Warren to their supporters on Tuesday night. This and the fact that he'll continue to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to implant his name in your brain. ![]() This uncertainty about the Sanders alternative is why you'll be hearing even more about Mike Bloomberg over the next week than you did over the past one, when you heard plenty. Besides, there's little evidence that she will do significantly better with African American and Latino voters than Buttigieg. Klobuchar's sudden surge may well be too little too late, even at this early stage of the contest. Democrats' appetite for a nominee less liberal than Sanders is real.īut is there a moderate around whom voters can coalesce?īuttigieg's enormously impressive performance in the first two states would make him the natural choice, except that he's 38, he still lags far behind Biden and Sanders in national polls, his highest office to date is mayor of a city of 100,000 people and he now moves on to two states, Nevada and then South Carolina, where his utter lack of traction with voters of color could undo his candidacy. He finished fifth, with less than 9%, and the dearth of confidence in him following his fourth-place showing in Iowa deepened, perhaps irreparably.īut add Biden's, Buttigieg's and Klobuchar's votes in New Hampshire and they far exceed those for the two prominent progressives, Sanders and Warren. Joe Biden has high-profile surrogates galore, is as conventionally prepared for the presidency as a human being could be, and basks in the vestigial good will that many Democratic voters feel toward President Barack Obama's administration. She finished fourth in New Hampshire, with less than 10% of the vote, though she had lavished hope, energy and resources on the state, next door to Massachusetts, which she represents in the Senate. Resolution was never likely to happen, not this year, not with Democratic voters' near-crippling anxiety about the surest path to the far side of Trump, not with this many viable but flawed candidates, not when there's so much noise in Washington and so much frustration in the air, not when so many voters have stopped taking cues from the institutions and traditions they frequently turned to in the past.Įlizabeth Warren was endorsed by respected media organizations. You expected resolution from New Hampshire? What an optimist you are! And how impatient. Sanders, a cranky 78-year-old who includes "socialist" in his description of his politics, is hardly in the clear. Note that while Sanders is hugely well-known in New Hampshire and beat Hillary Clinton by 22 points in its Democratic primary in 2016, he squeaked by Buttigieg this time around, as many people who voted for him four years ago obviously didn't do so on Tuesday night.įinally, brace for the days ahead, during which Sanders' strength will be seriously tested as he comes under brutal assault from Democrats who believe that his nomination would be suicidal for the party and guarantee President Donald Trump's re-election. Look at the sudden surge of Amy Klobuchar, whose strong third-place finish demonstrates not only how unsettled the contest is but also how many Democrats crave a moderate - or female - alternative to Sanders. And that victory, coming on the heels of his functional tie with Pete Buttigieg in the dysfunctional Iowa caucuses last week, makes him the indisputable front-runner for the Democratic nomination.īut look at how closely behind him Buttigieg finished, despite furious attacks from Sanders and other rivals over recent days. Yes, Bernie Sanders won the state's primary on Tuesday night. The Democratic race was messy going into New Hampshire.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |